Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutr. clín. diet. hosp ; 40(2): 83-89, 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198973

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Verificar la validez y confiabilidad de la escala de auto-percepción de la aptitud física EAF y proponer referencias por medio de percentiles en función del rango de edad y sexo MÉTODOS: Se estudiaron 1569 jóvenes (875 hombres y 694 mujeres) de una universidad del Perú. Se evaluó peso y estatura y se calculó el índice de Masa Corporal (IMC). La aptitud física se evaluó mediante la escala EAF. La validación se efectuó por medio de Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio (A-FC). La confiabilidad se verificó por medio de Alpha de Cronbach y se generaron percentiles para la categorización. RESULTADOS: La escala evidenció saturaciones superiores a 0,41 para 18 preguntas, el porcentaje de explicación de la varianza fue del 52%, el KMO fue de 0,911 (X2= 15578.883, gl= 435. El alpha de Cronbach mostró valores superiores a 0,75. Los percentiles propuestos fueron P15, p50, p85. CONCLUSIÓN: La escala de AAF es válida y confiable para jóvenes universitarios. Los percentiles son una alternativa para identificar, clasificar y categorizar los niveles de aptitud física


OBJECTIVE: To verify the validity and reliability of the scale of self-perception of physical aptitude EAF and to propose references by means of percentiles in function of the rank of age and sex METHODS: 1569 young people (875 men and 694 women) from a university in Peru were studied. Weight and height were assessed and the Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. The physical aptitude was evaluated using the AAF scale. The validation was carried out by means of Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (A-FC). Reliability was verified by means of Cronbach's Alpha and percentiles were generated for categorization. RESULTS: The scale showed saturations greater than 0.41 for 18 questions, the percentage explanation of the variance was 52%, the KMO was 0.911 (X2 = 15578.883, gl = 435. Cronbach's alpha showed values greater than 0.75. The percentiles proposed were P15, p50, p85. CONCLUSION: The AAF scale is valid and reliable for university students. The percentiles are an alternative to identify, classify and categorize levels of physical fitness


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Physical Fitness/physiology , Self Concept , Body Weights and Measures/statistics & numerical data , Reference Values , Students/statistics & numerical data , Age and Sex Distribution , Weight by Height/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...